Comics/Books

DC Pulls Controversial Batgirl Cover


Once again the internet finds itself in a maelstrom of controversy after DC revealed its lineup of Joker variants meant to celebrate the villain’s 75th anniversary last Friday. One cover in particular, from the lineup of 25, was damned as inappropriate and problematic. Artist Rafael Albuquerque created a cover for Batgirl #41 that was meant to pay homage to one of the Joker’s most infamous story lines, The Killing Joke. Unfortunately, the cover has not been met with a warm reception by fans. It features the Clown Prince of Crime wearing the iconic Hawaiian shirt and purple hat while interacting with Batgirl in an overtly suggestive manner. If you haven’t seen it yet, here it is:

BG-Cv41-Joker-variant-solicitation-88c4e-31e8d

The complaint with this cover is not its obvious throwback to The Killing Joke, but to the suggestion of sexual violence implied within it. Batgirl’s eyes plead with the viewer, her body language is tense and her single tear all draw the viewer to one conclusion. Similarly, in The Killing Joke itself, the Joker strips Barbara after shooting her. While there is never any explicit act of sexuality, the story has drawn criticisms from readers accusing the Joker of raping Barbara and thusly the story itself of sexualizing violence. There is an uncomfortable parallel in the unanswered questions of both the cover and the story, and that is what has caused an outcry. Especially in the wake of Batgirl’s recent makeover which has attracted a number of new, young, female readers to the series.

batgirl-35

Like many other controversies, this issue has not been quiet. It has spawned numerous articles and hashtags. As some fans rallied against the implicit portrayal of sexual violence, others fought back with equal passion. The debate has become heated enough that threats have been issued. Shockingly, some who were unoffended by the cover did take offence to others speaking up and began to issue threats of violence. In the wake of the uproar, DC has decided not to publish the cover. In a statement issued by the publisher in response to the debate and to the wishes of Albuquerque himself, they said that they support the wishes of their artists, and would therefore withdraw the cover from the roster of variants. Albuquerque came forward and said this:

My Batgirl variant cover artwork was designed to pay homage to a comic that I really admire, and I know is a favorite of many readers. ‘The Killing Joke’ is part of Batgirl’s canon and artistically, I couldn’t avoid portraying the traumatic relationship between Barbara Gordon and the Joker.

For me, it was just a creepy cover that brought up something from the characters past that I was able to interpret artistically. But it has become clear, that for others, it touched a very important nerve. I respect these opinions and, despite whether the discussion is right or wrong, no opinion should be discredited.

My intention was never to hurt or upset anyone through my art. For that reason, I have recommended to DC that the variant cover be pulled. I’m incredibly pleased that DC Comics is listening to my concerns and will not be publishing the cover art in June as previously announced.

With all due respect,

Rafa

DC and Albuquerque have done the right thing. Their decision has shown respect for their fans and zero tolerance for bullying. There is no reason why a debate such as this could not have taken the form of intellectual discourse, no reason that it needed to regress into cruelty and threats of violence. Fans, let’s respect each others opinions; it is impossible to be in agreement all the time as a community, but I am holding out hope that it is possible to discuss the differences and not just lash out at one another.

(Visited 250 times, 1 visits today)

3 Comments on DC Pulls Controversial Batgirl Cover

  1. Ian Tate

    …and this is why DC will always be inferior to Marvel. They cave to pressure and allow themselves to have their business dictated to them.

    Let me run this down for you. The Joker is a psychotic lunatic. The things he does are very bad. If it’s OK to put these bad things in the book, but not display a cover that reflects the content, this is called wimping out. Why publish the book in the first place if everybody is going to get their tights in a twist when they are faced with the reality of the Joker?

  2. Sunny

    @Ian –
    In The Killing Joke Babs was merely a poker chip to tip her father over the edge, using Commissioner Gordon as a pawn in the struggle between the Joker and Batman. Why should Batgirl’s cover reflect a story line where she played a tertiary role?

    The current tone of the Batgirl has changed. It’s not going for grim & gritty, but it is appealing to a new younger audience, many of whom weren’t born when The Killing Joke was first released.This cover is a disconnect what IS going on inside the covers of this book, where Babs is trying to be a normal grad student while fighting local crime. There are many moods of the “psychotic lunatic” Mr. J. Does this one comic variant cover need to be of him at his most vile – and should a the cover of any book show the protagonist as inconsequential?

    Is hearing different view points the same as “caving”, if they – like you seem to, just didn’t consider the various lenses besides “cool idea!”?

Leave a Comment